Back

Who we are

IFPRI in Africa provides on-the-ground support for local research, capacity building, and partnerships to reduce poverty and end malnutrition across the continent.

Back

What we do

We conduct evidence-based research on agriculture, food security, nutrition, gender, markets, and climate resilience—tailored to African contexts.

Back

Where we work

We share research findings with key stakeholders through policy dialogues, public events, workshops, publications, and blogs.

The cost and cost-effectiveness of integrating wasting prevention

The cost and cost-effectiveness of integrating wasting prevention into screening in facility- and community-based platforms in Burkina Faso and Mali

By Rebecca Brander; Elodie Becquey; Jef L Leroy; Marie Ruel; Lieven Huybregts 
Objectives: The release of the new WHO guideline on the prevention and treatment of child wasting identified a dearth of rigorous evidence on the cost-effectiveness of wasting-related interventions, and especially so for interventions that integrate prevention into screening. We estimated the cost and cost-effectiveness of integrating prevention interventions – behavior change communication (BCC) and small quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) – into a facility-based platform in Burkina Faso with enhanced BCC and a community-based platform in Mali with standard BCC.
Methods: We used activity-based costing to estimate costs per child-contact, using data from accounting records, interviews, surveys, and observations. We used a Markov model to estimate costs per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted using data from the parent randomized controlled trials on impact on wasting incidence and treatment coverage.
Results: In the intervention group in Burkina Faso, the costs per child-contact of facility-based screening, enhanced BCC, and SQ-LNS were $0.85, $4.28, and $8.86, respectively. In Mali, community-based screening, standard BCC, and SQ-LNS costs were $0.57, $0.72, and $4.14, respectively. Unit costs for the intervention group were higher in Burkina Faso than Mali due to higher general program costs, staff/supervision, and SQ-LNS storage/handling. SQ-LNS constituted the largest cost component in both countries. Although no SQ-LNS costs were incurred in the comparison groups (hence lower total costs), costs per child-contact for screening and BCC were higher, because coverage of these services was lower. The intervention package cost $1073 per DALY averted in Burkina Faso and $747 in Mali.
Find out more on this paper here 
Source:cgiar.org